|
News Flash |
-
11:06 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
John F Kennedy’s mistress details their affair in new bookThe teenage mistress of President John F Kennedy has written a memoir describing how he both abused and confided in her during an 18 month affair which ended only with his death. At the height of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, as the world teetered on the brink of a nuclear war between the United States and the Soviets, Kennedy hinted to his lover that he would be prepared to blink first: “I’d rather my children were red than dead.”
Read more...
-
10:51 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
French interior minister claims some civilisations 'superior’France’s conservative interior minister in charge of immigration policy has sparked controversy by claiming some civilisations are “superior” to others.
Read more...
-
08:26 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
Syria's most senior defector: Assad's army is close to collapseBashar al-Assad's army is close to a collapse that could plunge the Middle East into a "nuclear reaction"
Read more...
-
07:56 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
Question:Romney says he is not concerned with the poor, Gingrich wants to build a moon colony for $500 Billion, Paul sent out a racist newsletter and wants to legalize prostitutes, and Santorum is unhindged.Yet Obama is silent..... Why?Answer:Obama is getting a beat-up Romney and a split GOP......just like he wanted.
Read more...
-
07:42 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
Heathrow cancels 50% of flights as snow and ice blanket BritainAirport says "snow plan" has worked "far better" than in previous years, despite axing flights hours after it stopped snowing.
Read more...
-
07:33 - 05.02.2012
News >> Latest
Sacrificing the desert to save the EarthIndustrial-scale solar development is mowing down desert plants and displacing animals. Environmentalists are torn.
Read more...
-
06:54 - 04.02.2012
News >> Latest
GOP freshmen mum on presidential politicsThe House Republican freshman class has fallen largely silent on a most pressing issue: Who should be the GOP presidential nominee?"Some say the field has been uninspiring and wish that more candidates had jumped into the race. Others say they want voters to make up their own minds. Some just want to focus on their own reelection."
Read more...
-
06:13 - 04.02.2012
News >> Latest
News on economy could alter calculus for Romney’s campaignPhilip Rucker / WashPostIf the recovery snowballs, the Republican front-runner’s primary pitch may be undercut."If Romney wins the nomination, his strategists argued, the fall campaign against President Obama will be shaped by what they described as an overarching sense of “prolonged misery” among voters who are just as concerned about the housing crisis as with unemployment and believe the nation is on the wrong track."
Read more...
-
05:58 - 04.02.2012
News >> Latest
Don’t buy the GOP’s ‘Europe’Martin Klingst Portraying the continent as socialistic or outdated is both shortsighted and wrong."All 27 E.U. members believe, more or less, in mandatory health-care insurance and public education. They believe that government should offer a helping hand to struggling businesses and people during economic downturns. That is why we pay high taxes. It is also true that a number of E.U. countries have irresponsibly expanded their welfare systems and can no longer afford their bills."
Read more...
-
05:45 - 04.02.2012
News >> Latest
The Koch Brothers Pledge $60 Million to Defeat ObamaSo the Koch people really don't like Obama. But $60 million is a lot of money, and shows the kind of funding that a few people can put into a race with the advent of Super-PACs, where most of their money will probably go due to restrictions on donations to actual campaigns.
Read more...
|
|
|
|
Leaders know voters are not prepared to change their lifestyle. |
|
Polly Toynbee: While Copenhagen may fall far short of the deal we need, leaders know voters are not prepared to change their lifestyle |
|
|
Obama emerges from climate talks with bruised stature. |
|
Obama emerges from climate talks with slender pact and bruised statureUS president urges decisive action on climate change, but shows no sign that Washington will take such steps itself
Barack Obama emerged from the chaotic final hours of the Copenhagen summit last night having salvaged an agreement for action on global warming – and his own reputation as a politician who can bridge the most challenging of political divides. After 15 hours of negotiations, an exhausted looking Obama said he managed to secure a deal on climate change incorporating America's three main goals of emissions cuts, financial aid for the poorest countries, and a measure of accountability for emissions pledges from developing countries. But he acknowledged the skimpy 2.5 page draft produced at the end of his effort was not the comprehensive agreement he had come to Copenhagen for. "I think it is important that instead of setting up a bunch of goals that just end up not being met, that we get moving," he said. "We just keep moving forward." Obama's hectic day of negotiations began immediately on his arrival in Copenhagen, when he encountered what he described as a "fundamental deadlock" between rich and developing countries. Much of that was a product of the deep resentment at America for its emissions reductions target: a 17% reduction over 2005 levels by 2020. That offer too was conditional on Congress passing climate change legislation. In the final days of the summit, a more vexing issue emerged over America's demands that China and other rapidly emerging countries offer an accounting of their actions to curb the growth of greenhouse gas emissions. Obama emerged last night claiming to have wrung an important concession from China and India to offer a fuller accounting of its emissions reductions. "The truth is that we can actually monitor a lot of what takes place through satellite imagery and so forth," he said. The reassurances are crucial for American domestic political consumption, where there is concern about losing economic ground to China and India in the transition to a clean energy economy. It did not seem at first that the president would be capable of breaking down the divide. Obama's eight-minute speech to the summit was viewed as a huge disappointment. Although he called for bold and decisive action, Obama – who had been skittish at going to Copenhagen in the first place – offered no sign that Washington was willing to take such steps itself. There were no further commitments on reducing emissions, or on finance for poor countries, beyond Hillary Clinton's announcement that the US would support a $100bn global fund to help developing nations adapt to climate change. He did not press the Senate to move ahead on climate change legislation, which environmental organisations have been urging for months. Obama did say America would follow through on his administration's clean energy agenda, and would live up to its pledges. But in the absence of any evidence of that commitment the words rang hollow and there was a palpable sense of disappointment in the audience. He warned African and island countries that the alternative – of no agreement – was worse. Obama's lacklustre speech proved a frustration to a summit that had been looking to him to use his stature on the world stage, and his following among African leaders, to reach an ambitious deal. But by the end of the day, after Obama spent hours closeted with Chinese, Indian, South African and Brazilian officials, he managed to pull the situation back from the brink. In his press conference, Obama held up the results of his deal-making as a sign that the era of American isolation under George Bush was over, and that he had returned the country to a position of leadership. The day of diplomacy also allowed him to reassert the political skills which have not been seen to best advantage in the US during the struggles over health care and Afghanistan. "The time has come for us to get off the sidelines and shape the future that we seek. That is why I came to Copenhagen today," he said. "I believe that what we achieved in Copenhagen is not going to be the end, but rather the beginning." |
|
|
U.N. agrees to "recognise" the US-brokered climate deal |
|
As delegates agree to "recognise" the US-brokered deal, Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary general, welcomes the progress in the face of strong opposition from developing nations. Read Article |
|
|
Leaders hail 'meaningful' climate change deal |
|
World leaders hailed an “historic” deal on climate change after two weeks of difficult negotiations in Copenhagen. Read Article |
|
|
China holds the world to ransom |
|
Michael McCarthy: Beijing accused of standing in the way of climate change treaty at Copenhagen as US throws down the gauntlet by backing $100bn fund to help poorest countries Read Article |
|
|
LAT: Will the Huffington Post strategy pay off? |
|
Arianna Huffington says of the Huffington Post: "Our site is not built around the freebie. Our site is built around very hard-working editors and reporters who do all the curating and aggregating and original content. Then bloggers can write when they want, if they want." Read Article |
|
|
NYT Mag: The Conservative-Christian Big Thinker |
|
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK Robert P. George, a Princeton University professor of jurisprudence and a Roman Catholic, is this country’s most influential conservative Christian thinker. Read Article
“If there really is a vast right-wing conspiracy,” the conservative Catholic journal Crisis concluded a few years ago, “its leaders probably meet in George’s kitchen.” |
|
|
The "Voice of Golf" predicted Tiger's Fall. |
|
Peter Alliss: 'I always thought it could all go wrong for Tiger' The garrulous Voice of Golf, delivers his typically forthright verdict on the scandal of the year David Ashdown "He's a handsome black man married to a beautiful white girl, and there are some strange people in America, who take exception to that." Read Article |
|
|
Democratic congressman hears it from angry supporters |
|
Democratic congressman from North Carolina angers supporters by voting against health-care bill
Rep. Larry Kissell (D-N.C.) voted against health-care reform even though it is badly needed in the largely rural district he represents. (Jim R. Bounds For The Washington Post) Read Article "People want change, and when someone puts their foot in the door to kill the whole thing, that's what has them riled up," said Michael Lawson, an African American leader of the state Democratic Party and one of Kissell's constituents. "It's almost like 'Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,' but Mr. Smith turned out to be somebody that wasn't Mr. Smith." |
|
|
Obama says world is 'running out of time' |
|
President has given warning that the Copenhagen climate conference is running out of time amid fears that the meeting could yet end in failure. |
|
|
NYT: Liberal Revolt on Health Care Stings White House |
|
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG Liberals like Senator Bernard Sanders are signaling that they have compromised enough to win over moderates. |
|
|
Iraq Insurgents Hack U.S. Drones |
|
Militants in Iraq have used inexpensive, off-the-shelf software to intercept video feeds from Predator drones. Read Article |
|
|
Nation of Islam investigated - Illegally. |
|
Nation of Islam investigated: U.S. recalled 2007 intelligence probe on group because report violated rules about spying on AmericansBy Sebastian Rotella Tribune Newspapers December 17, 2009 WASHINGTON -- The Department of Homeland Security issued but then recalled a 2007 intelligence analysis about the Nation of Islam after deciding that the document broke rules on intelligence activity in the U.S., officials said Wednesday.
Internal DHS documents reveal that intelligence chiefs found that analysts "unintentionally and inadvertently" violated rules governing the collection, retention and distribution of information concerning "U.S. persons and organizations." The apparent error took place during the Bush administration, an agency spokesman said Wednesday, adding that steps have been taken to ensure it does not happen again.
"DHS has implemented a strong and rigorous system of safeguards and oversight to ensure similar products are neither created nor distributed," said Matthew Chandler, a spokesman for the agency. "DHS is fully committed to securing the nation from terrorist attacks and other threats, and we take very seriously our responsibility to protect the civil rights and liberties of the American people while fulfilling this mission."
The 2007 analysis was titled "Nation of Islam: Uncertain Leadership Succession Poses Risk," according to DHS documents released Wednesday as the result of Freedom of Information Act lawsuits by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a privacy group.
At the time, Nation of Islam leader Minister Louis Farrakhan had ceded control to an executive board and gone into seclusion to recover from complications of prostate cancer treatment.
He remains active, though his exact role in the Chicago-based group is unclear. Nation of Islam officials did not return calls for comment.
After the analysis came out, a subsequent review found the analysis had violated internal intelligence guidelines that protect civil liberties and govern the collection and retention of information on the Nation of Islam and other "U.S. persons," a supervisory official wrote.
"The intelligence note on the Nation of Islam should not have been written," the official wrote. "The organization -- despite its highly volatile and extreme rhetoric -- has neither advocated violence nor engaged in violence." The official stressed that the violation had not been intentional and that during more than two years, this was the first among thousands of intelligence analyses about which questions had been raised.
A Columbia University researcher who focuses on the Nation of Islam said the revelation recalled FBI probes in the 1960s and 1970s.
The U.S. government has long been interested in leaders of the religious movement that melds black nationalism with the Islamic faith, said Zaheer Ali. "As a historian, it's not surprising that the federal agencies under a new name -- in this case 'Homeland Security' -- would be so interested."
While no investigation has produced evidence suggesting the Nation of Islam poses a threat, such concerns linger, he said.
"In the minds of many, Islam poses a threat. Black people pose a threat. And the combination of black people and Islam pose a threat in the imagination of people," Ali said. "I don't think our intelligence community is immune to these kinds of perceptions."
The analysis under scrutiny was prepared in October 2007 by the Office of Intelligence and Analysis of the Department of Homeland Security, according to agency officials.
That office acts in cases involving domestic security as a conduit for the flow of intelligence between federal agencies -- principally the FBI -- and state and local law enforcement authorities.
DHS intelligence personnel in that office routinely write analyses based on information gathered by other agencies, but do not engage in intelligence collection in the field, officials said.
The intelligence and analysis note was distributed by e-mail to 482 recipients, including federal intelligence officials, congressional staff and "at least one state government entity and one educational institution," a DHS report said, without naming them.
Immediately after the note about the Nation of Islam was sent, the office's intelligence oversight officer and its associate general counsel "expressed concerns" about its "content and dissemination," documents said.
DHS intelligence officials contacted the recipients and asked them to delete the note, the documents say.
Tribune reporter Manya A. Brachear contributed to this report from Chicago. |
|
|
Senator Ben Nelson - The Senate’s Game Changer |
|
The Senate’s Game ChangerNati Harnik/Associated Press An opponent of health care legislation demonstrates outside Senator Ben Nelson’s office in Omaha, Neb., on Tuesday. The Nebraska Cornhuskers may have just missed out on college football’s Bowl Championship Series, but with the Great Health Care Debate of 2009 late in the fourth quarter, the whole game seems to be riding on one of the Huskers’ biggest fans: Senator Ben Nelson. Mr. Nelson, who is arguably the most conservative of the Senate’s Democrats, has been uncertain about the health care legislation all year long, reminding reporters and colleagues alike that he will not make up his mind until he has gotten a close look at the bill. And given that the bill keeps changing — yet another version of it is expected to be revealed by the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, within the next 48 hours — it has not been particularly easy for Mr. Nelson to come to a decision one way or another. But with other Senate Democrats saying that their major concerns appear to have been addressed, Mr. Nelson seems to be the last big holdout. Mr. Reid is getting ready to throw him the ball, and if Mr. Nelson catches it, the question is: which way will he run? Mr. Nelson has said that perhaps his biggest concern is the issue of insurance coverage for abortions. He proposed an amendment seeking to tighten restrictions in the Senate bill, and it was defeated. But Senate leaders are trying hard to find a compromise. He has already made a mark on the bill. After Mr. Nelson, a former state insurance commissioner and insurance company executive, said he would not support a provision ending the industry’s limited exemption from antitrust laws, Mr. Reid stripped it out. “Until I see more details, I am not going to know whether I could support the bill,” Mr. Nelson said in a conference call on Wednesday. Mr. Nelson disputed rumors that he was being pressured or that Congressional leaders or the White House were trying to buy his vote with financial aid for his home state. “They are false, period,” he said. “Nebraskans who have known me for decades, know my vote cannot be bought and I cannot be threatened.” He added: “I am looking at this health care reform on its own merits, on what’s best for Nebraskans.” He laid out a list of concerns, including the provisions related to abortion, questions about efforts to slow Medicare spending, and worries over proposed new taxes, fees and other mandates in the bill. Mr. Nelson said he wants to be sure the bill will help contain long-term health care spending. He said he was opposed to a new long-term care insurance program included in the bill, and that he was skeptical about proposed cuts in payments to nursing homes and for home health care providers. Mr. Nelson said he had met with President Obama for the third time in eight days and had expressed his concerns about the legislation while also hearing out Mr. Obama. “He made a strong case for passing health care reform, but it remains to be seen if it was compelling,” he said. But even as he said he had major concerns about the legislation, Mr. Nelson also described the current state of the health care system as unacceptable. He said that without legislation, some residents of his state would face bankruptcy as a result of medical bills, while others would die as a result of lacking health insurance. “Not trying to help Nebraskans would be the worst thing I could do,” he said. Even if Mr. Nelson ultimately supports the legislation, it remains to be seen if he will agree to do so in time to meet Mr. Reid’s goal of passing the bill by Christmas. Mr. Nelson has previously expressed reluctance to support a partisan health care bill. And so far no Republican has expressed support. Senator Olympia J. Snowe, Republican of Maine, had a strong hand in writing the legislation in the Senate Finance Committee and has said she very much wants to vote for a heath care overhaul. But she has also made clear that she thinks Democrats are rushing it. Mr. Nelson said that even as all eyes turn to him, he’s not feeling any heat. “I am not feeling any pressure from the party,” he said. “I know what they would like me to do.” |
|
|
Success on health reform holds risks for Democrats |
|
Success on health reform holds risks for Democrats
By Matthew Dowd Thursday, December 17, 2009 President Obama needs an exit strategy. I am not referring to Afghanistan or Iraq (though there are quite a few similarities between the situation Obama is in on health-care reform and the political difficulties President George W. Bush faced on Iraq). Congressional Democrats and Obama are headed toward a "catastrophic success" politically if they pass health-care reform in its current legislative form. And catastrophic success was a term then-President Bush used on Iraq when he acknowledged the great initial victory but didn't take into account the long-term calamity and costs. I am not seeking to argue the substance of health care and the merits or demerits of the bills, and will leave that to experts in policy and its effects. I am talking about the politics of the legislation and the effect it is likely to have on Obama and Democrats in Congress. Unlike many other pundits and political experts in both parties, I think that passage of a bill by the Democrats at this point will be politically damaging to both the president and congressional Democrats. Conversely, defeat of the legislation is much more likely to hurt Republicans in Congress. The latest Post-ABC News poll shows the president's overall approval rating at a new low of 50 percent -- about the rating President Bush had going into the November 2004 election, when Democrats said Bush was ripe for defeat. There are many reasons for this drop in support for Obama. The stagnant economy is the biggest factor, but close behind is the fact that the administration is pushing health-reform efforts that have polarized the electorate, and that independent and swing voters have moved against in large measure. As Wednesday's Post-ABC poll shows, a majority of Americans believe that if this bill passes, their health-care costs will rise, the federal deficit will increase, the costs of the overall health-care system will climb, and their own care would be better if the system stays as is. Democrats (including former president Bill Clinton) claim that they need this bill to pass for political reasons. But let's examine that. At present, a majority of Americans are against the effort, the legislation lacks bipartisan support, the costs of the reforms are upfront, and the benefits won't kick in until after the 2012 elections. When has that ever been a formula for political success? If this legislation passes, Democrats will be held accountable for any failures or problems in the system. So if Americans' insurance premiums rise, they will blame the Democrats. If patients have to wait in line at emergency rooms, it will be seen as the Democrats' fault. If health-care costs don't drop, the Democrats will face the wrath of the electorate. Many Democrats, including people in the administration, blame poor marketing for their difficulties in passing health reform. They say they haven't gotten the message out. But advocates of reform have spent millions on advertising and lobbying this year. And Obama, who many say is the best orator ever to occupy the White House, has pushed for this legislation constantly over the past six months. In that time, support for Obama's handling of health-care reform has dropped by more than a net of 30 points. Yet before Republicans cheer that they may defeat this effort, they should beware what they wish for. A vast majority of Americans still believes that we need fundamental health-care reform. If the legislation fails, Democrats can blame Republicans by saying reform was in sight and the GOP blocked it without offering a real alternative to decrease costs and increase access. The dominant issues today are the economy and jobs, and the public doesn't see either party making these a real priority. Further, polls show trust in government handling of domestic issues remains at historic lows. What most voters hear from Washington these days is squabbling over health reform involving a government role they don't trust and don't want. My advice? Leaders in Washington ought to concentrate on what matters to Americans, not on what they think should matter to voters. Come up with a health-care bill that draws real bipartisan support. And before pushing a bigger role for government, begin to restore trust in the government's ability to do even small things. Democrats pushing so hard for success on health care could find themselves in a situation resembling President Bush's situation on Iraq. They could topple the statue and win the day, but lose politically over the coming months and years. The writer, a political analyst for ABC News, was the chief strategist for George W. Bush's 2004 presidential campaign. |
|
|
Word Prompts Apology From Schumer |
|
Harry Hamburg/Associated Press Senator Charles E. Schumer Word Prompts Apology From Schumer Senator Charles E. Schumer apologized on Wednesday for using a crude term to refer to a flight attendant who had asked him to turn his cellphone off on a US Airways plane before takeoff. Mr. Schumer and his fellow Democratic senator from New York, Kirsten E. Gillibrand, were seated next to each other on the New York-to-Washington flight on Sunday, and both were talking on their cellphones, according to Politico.com, which first reported the incident. After an announcement that cellphones must be turned off, both senators initially kept talking on their phones. Ms. Gillibrand ended her call, but Mr. Schumer kept talking. The flight attendant then approached Mr. Schumer and told him the entire plane was waiting for him to shut off his phone. Mr. Schumer ended the call, but then argued that he was entitled to keep his phone on until the cabin door closed. When the flight attendant, whom Politico did not identify, walked away Mr. Schumer turned to Ms. Gillibrand and described the attendant as a “bitch.” A Republican aide on the plane overheard Mr. Schumer’s comment and described the incident to Politico. The aide was not identified. After it was reported on the Politico Web site on Tuesday, Mr. Schumer issued an apology and called the flight attendant to say he was sorry. “The senator made an off-the-cuff comment under his breath that he shouldn’t have made, and he regrets it,” said Brian Fallon, a Schumer spokesman. The Federal Aviation Administration says it is a violation of aviation regulations to disobey the instructions of a flight crew. Through her office, Ms. Gillibrand said Mr. Schumer was “polite” and “turned off his phone when asked.” But according to the aide who overheard Mr. Schumer, the phone rang again moments after the attendant had told Mr. Schumer to shut it off. “It’s Harry Reid calling, I guess health care will have to wait until we land,” Mr. Schumer said. |
|
|
Republicans, religion and the triumph of unreason |
|
Republicans, religion and the triumph of unreason How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality? Sarah Palin really has claimed ? with a straight face ? that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby Something strange has happened in America in the nine months since Barack Obama was elected. It has best been summarised by the comedian Bill Maher: "The Democrats have moved to the right, and the Republicans have moved to a mental hospital." The election of Obama – a black man with an anti-conservative message – as a successor to George W. Bush has scrambled the core American right's view of their country. In their gut, they saw the US as a white-skinned, right-wing nation forever shaped like Sarah Palin. When this image was repudiated by a majority of Americans in a massive landslide, it simply didn't compute. How could this have happened? How could the cry of "Drill, baby, drill" have been beaten by a supposedly big government black guy? So a streak that has always been there in the American right's world-view – to deny reality, and argue against a demonic phantasm of their own creation – has swollen. Now it is all they can see. Related articlesSince Obama's rise, the US right has been skipping frantically from one fantasy to another, like a person in the throes of a mental breakdown. It started when they claimed he was a secret Muslim, and – at the same time – that he was a member of a black nationalist church that hated white people. Then, once these arguments were rejected and Obama won, they began to argue that he was born in Kenya and secretly smuggled into the United States as a baby, and the Hawaiian authorities conspired to fake his US birth certificate. So he is ineligible to rule and the office of President should pass to... the Republican runner-up, John McCain. These aren't fringe phenomena: a Research 200 poll found that a majority of Republicans and Southerners say Obama wasn't born in the US, or aren't sure. A steady steam of Republican congressmen have been jabbering that Obama has "questions to answer". No amount of hard evidence – here's his birth certificate, here's a picture of his mother heavily pregnant in Hawaii, here's the announcement of his birth in the local Hawaiian paper – can pierce this conviction. This trend has reached its apotheosis this summer with the Republican Party now claiming en masse that Obama wants to set up "death panels" to euthanise the old and disabled. Yes: Sarah Palin really has claimed – with a straight face – that Barack Obama wants to kill her baby. You have to admire the audacity of the right. Here's what's actually happening. The US is the only major industrialised country that does not provide regular healthcare to all its citizens. Instead, they are required to provide for themselves – and 50 million people can't afford the insurance. As a result, 18,000 US citizens die every year needlessly, because they can't access the care they require. That's equivalent to six 9/11s, every year, year on year. Yet the Republicans have accused the Democrats who are trying to stop all this death by extending healthcare of being "killers" – and they have successfully managed to put them on the defensive. The Republicans want to defend the existing system, not least because they are given massive sums of money by the private medical firms who benefit from the deadly status quo. But they can't do so honestly: some 70 per cent of Americans say it is "immoral" to retain a medical system that doesn't cover all citizens. So they have to invent lies to make any life-saving extension of healthcare sound depraved. A few months ago, a recent board member for several private health corporations called Betsy McCaughey reportedly noticed a clause in the proposed healthcare legislation that would pay for old people to see a doctor and write a living will. They could stipulate when (if at all) they would like care to be withdrawn. It's totally voluntary. Many people want it: I know I wouldn't want to be kept alive for a few extra months if I was only going to be in agony and unable to speak. But McCaughey started the rumour that this was a form of euthanasia, where old people would be forced to agree to death. This was then stretched to include the disabled, like Palin's youngest child, who she claimed would have to "justify" his existence. It was flatly untrue – but the right had their talking-point, Palin declared the non-existent proposals "downright evil", and they were off. It's been amazingly successful. Now, every conversation about healthcare has to begin with a Democrat explaining at great length that, no, they are not in favour of killing the elderly – while Republicans get away with defending a status quo that kills 18,000 people a year. The hypocrisy was startling: when Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska, she encouraged citizens there to take out living wills. Almost all the Republicans leading the charge against "death panels" have voted for living wills in the past. But the lie has done its work: a confetti of distractions has been thrown up, and support is leaking away from the plan that would save lives. These increasingly frenzied claims have become so detached from reality that they often seem like black comedy. The right-wing magazine US Investors' Daily claimed that if Stephen Hawking had been British, he would have been allowed to die at birth by its "socialist" healthcare system. Hawking responded with a polite cough that he is British, and "I wouldn't be here without the NHS". This tendency to simply deny inconvenient facts and invent a fantasy world isn't new; it's only becoming more heightened. It ran through the Bush years like a dash of bourbon in water. When it became clear that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, the US right simply claimed they had been shipped to Syria. When the scientific evidence for man-made global warming became unanswerable, they claimed – as one Republican congressman put it – that it was "the greatest hoax in human history", and that all the world's climatologists were "liars". The American media then presents itself as an umpire between "the rival sides", as if they both had evidence behind them. It's a shame, because there are some areas in which a conservative philosophy – reminding us of the limits of grand human schemes, and advising caution – could be a useful corrective. But that's not what these so-called "conservatives" are providing: instead, they are pumping up a hysterical fantasy that serves as a thin skin covering some raw economic interests and base prejudices. For many of the people at the top of the party, this is merely cynical manipulation. One of Bush's former advisers, David Kuo, has said the President and Karl Rove would mock evangelicals as "nuts" as soon as they left the Oval Office. But the ordinary Republican base believe this stuff. They are being tricked into opposing their own interests through false fears and invented demons. Last week, one of the Republicans sent to disrupt a healthcare town hall started a fight and was injured – and then complained he had no health insurance. I didn't laugh; I wanted to weep. How do they train themselves to be so impervious to reality? It begins, I suspect, with religion. They are taught from a young age that it is good to have "faith" – which is, by definition, a belief without any evidence to back it up. You don't have "faith" that Australia exists, or that fire burns: you have evidence. You only need "faith" to believe the untrue or unprovable. Indeed, they are taught that faith is the highest aspiration and most noble cause. Is it any surprise this then percolates into their political views? Faith-based thinking spreads and contaminates the rational. Up to now, Obama has not responded well to this onslaught of unreason. He has had a two-pronged strategy: conciliate the elite economic interests, and joke about the fanatical fringe they are stirring up. He has (shamefully) assured the pharmaceutical companies that an expanded healthcare system will not use the power of government as a purchaser to bargain down drug prices, while wryly saying in public that he "doesn't want to kill Grandma". Rather than challenging these hard interests and bizarre fantasies aggressively, he has tried to flatter and soothe them. This kind of mania can't be co-opted: it can only be overruled. Sometimes in politics you will have enemies, and they must be democratically defeated. The political system cannot be gummed up by a need to reach out to the maddest people or the greediest constituencies. There is no way to expand healthcare without angering Big Pharma and the Republicaloons. So be it. As Arianna Huffington put it, "It is as though, at the height of the civil rights movement, you thought you had to bring together Martin Luther King and George Wallace and make them agree. It's not how change happens." However strange it seems, the Republican Party really is spinning off into a bizarre cult who believe Barack Obama is a baby-killer plotting to build death panels for the grannies of America. Their new slogan could be – shrill, baby, shrill. |
|
|
Obama vs. the liberals: Pass the tea to the left
Bernie Sanders, independent senator from Vermont, is unhappy about Bernanke, and Coburn, and . . . (Evan Vucci/associated Press) "Liberals are turning against President Obama with an energy that until now has been reserved for Fox News viewers who wear tri-corner hats and wave yellow "Don't Tread on Me" flags" Read Article |
|
|
Democrats can't blame Bush for their troubles |
|
Dionne: They must learn to prosper without the former president. Read Article |
|
|
In Senate Health Showdown, Round Goes to G.O.P. |
|
In Senate Health Showdown, Round Goes to G.O.P. 
Stephen Crowley/The New York Times Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Senate Republican leader, said Democrats were in a “blind rush.” Read Article |
|
|
US backs plan for $100bn climate change fund |
|
Hillary Clinton backs proposals for a $100 billion-a-year international fund to tackle global warming in developing countries in a boost for deadlocked talks in Copenhagen. Read Article |
|
|
Joe Lieberman - Rogue liberal |
|
|
Poll: Dissatisfaction could spell trouble for Democrats in 2010 |
|
Poll: Dissatisfaction could spell trouble for Democrats in 2010As President Obama's supporters grow listless and independents grow irritated, Republicans have a greater opportunity to dominate midterm elections, according to findings of the Battleground Poll.
Reporting from Washington - Anger among independent voters about the economy and the direction the nation is taking offer Republicans a significant opportunity to reclaim power in the 2010 midterm congressional elections, according to the results of the bipartisan Battleground Poll released today.
A lack of passion among President Obama's core supporters and an absence of confidence that the administration's policies and congressional spending are producing sorely needed new jobs also pose a serious challenge to the president's party in 2010.
Those are among the findings of a long-established team of Republican and Democratic pollsters, sponsored by George Washington University, which has measured the president's public job-approval rating at a low point for any first-year president in December.
"What a difference a year makes," said Christopher Arterton, dean of the graduate school of political management at GWU.
The president's job-approval rating has slipped to 49%, Republican pollster Ed Goeas and Democratic pollster Celinda Lake say. And the percentage of people who strongly disapprove of the president's performance, 41%, outweighs the 37% who strongly approve.
Disapproval of the job that Congress is doing has risen to 68%, "an all-time high," and 77% among independent voters.
The problem for the president's party, the pollsters say, is that the most passionate supporters of the Democratic president appear less likely to turn out to vote in congressional elections next year. And the most angry of the independent voters -- a swing-voting bloc that supported Obama in 2008 -- appear heavily motivated to vote against Democrats.
"There is a potential for this being the 1994 of the angry white male," said Goeas, pointing to the pivotal year during President Clinton's first term when Republicans gained control of the House.
Because of a struggling economy with widespread job losses, Goeas said, "the pool of angry independents is larger than what you normally see in an off-year election year. It is certainly something that is going to be problematic for the Democrats. . . .
"I've come to the conclusion on independents . . . that what really drives them is, they dislike both parties, and they dislike the party in power more," said Goeas, a seasoned Republican pollster at the Tarrance Group, speaking at a breakfast with reporters to present the findings of the newest Battleground Poll. The poll, conducted Dec. 6 to 9, surveyed 1,000 registered voters. It carries a possible margin of error of plus or minus 3.1%
The challenge for Obama's party, the pollsters say, is presenting policies during the first few months of 2010 that clearly offer the promise of new jobs in an economy in which unemployment has reached 10%.
"It's still the economy," Lake said. "If you ask people how they are feeling about the economy, people are very anxious. . . .
"The one most important thing is that Democrats still are winning the vote among people who are most concerned about the economy," said Lake, longtime Democratic pollster at Lake Research Partners. "The No. 1 thing the Democrats have to do is prove they really have a jobs program and an economic program that is going to sell on Main Street."
The economy and jobs rank as the most important issue that Congress should work on among 40% of those surveyed. The cost of healthcare ranks as the top issue among just 15%.
The survey also reveals a "disconnect" between what most voters would like to see in healthcare -- controlling the cost of medical care -- and what they view as the president's priority: insuring the uninsured.
"Only 28% said their priorities match Obama's priorities, and 64% said they do not," Goeas said. "There's a disconnect."
Most voters surveyed, 56%, say the country is on the wrong track, with 34% seeing the nation going in the right direction.
In a "generic" contest between an unnamed Democratic candidate and an unnamed Republican candidate for Congress, 42% of those surveyed said they would support the Republican; 40% opted for the Democrat.
Among those swing-voting independents: 40% said they would select the Republican; 19%, the Democrat.
The voters most likely to support Republican candidates for Congress are more likely to vote next year, according to the survey.
More than three-quarters of Republicans and independents surveyed said they were extremely likely to vote, with fewer than two-thirds of Democrats extremely likely to vote, including 58% of African American voters surveyed.
The Democratic Party's problem is twofold, Lake said: "the intensity of the anger among the independents and the lack of intensity among the 'Obama surge' voters" who helped elect the president.
Although Obama remains personally popular, the poll shows, his policies have proved less so.
Disapproval of the president's job performance is "driven not by the personality of the president, but the policies of the president," Goaes said. "Obama has done more to improve the image of the Republican Party than anything that we've been able to do for years."
Goeas also predicts that, even as the economy improves, deficit spending will become a bigger political problem for the Democrats.
The question of deficit spending translates readily to taxes, he said, and Republicans hold a 55-28 percentage-point advantage on the question of holding down taxes.
Regaining control of the Senate will prove more difficult for the Republicans, Goeas said, and the challenge in reclaiming control of the House will hinge on how many incumbents retire next year and how well the GOP recruits new candidates.
The challenge for Democrats, Lake said, is translating all of the spending underway into the promise of new jobs.
"Spending is rising in people's attention," she said. "If people thought a million jobs were being created by the spending, they wouldn't care about what the spending is. . . . We haven't proven to voters that we are spending money to create jobs for them. Any challenge for Democrats is to turn those bills" into jobs.
The president's party still has an opportunity to regain voter support before the midterm elections, Lake maintains.
"I think we have quite a bit of control over our destiny," Lake said. "We have the ability to really aggressively talk about jobs," the ability to get a healthcare overhaul passed, the ability to address immigration reform and the ability to bring troops home from Iraq.
"We better seize control of our destiny," the Democrat said. "Now we need to present some plans, we need to implement them, we need to set a direction."
The Battleground Survey polled 1,000 registered, likely voters.
|
|
|
Obama expected to sign Till bill |
|
Obama expected to sign Till bill
Jerry Mitchell President Barack Obama is expected to sign later this week legislation that would include funding to pursue and prosecute those responsible for killings during the civil rights era. "There are perpetrators out there," said Alvin Sykes of Kansas City, architect of the bill. "They need to understand the hunt is on." Four suspects are still alive in the Ku Klux Klan's June 21, 1964, killings of James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner. Only one man, Edgar Ray Killen, has ever been prosecuted for murder in the slayings that drew attention around the world. Killen, now serving 60 years in prison, is appealing his 2005 conviction. "With the funding in place, we'll have the resources to investigate more diligently," Sykes said. In 2004, when the Justice Department reopened the 1955 killing of Emmett Till, an FBI agent was assigned full-time to the case, but that hasn't happened in many other cases, Sykes said. Instead, he said, agents have had to juggle these cases with their many other responsibilities. Congress first considered what is known as the Emmett Till Unsolved Civil Rights Crime Act in 2005. It took three years before Congress passed the legislation - albeit without funding. Rather than waiting for the legislation to pass, the Justice Department in 2006 began its own Cold Case Initiative to look into 108 killings from the civil rights era. Officials announced recently that those identified as suspects in nearly half the killings have died. And they found that 20 of those killings were not racially motivated homicides. The FBI recently asked for the public's help in solving 33 slayings. Sykes said the legislation will provide more agents and prosecutors to investigate the cases. Agents have been able to use information in the FBI's files, "but there hasn't been an aggressive outreach," Sykes said. "With the funding in place, they'll be able to search and find these individuals. They'll have the resources to investigate more diligently." World renowned pathologist Dr. Michael Baden went public recently with his discovery in X-rays that two bullets were never removed from Chaney's body. The 1964 X-ray report from radiologist Dr. James Packer confirms what Baden found: "A fracture of the left upper humerus observed with multiple metal fragments seen in the soft tissues adjacent to this fracture. A fracture of the upper end of the left ulna is observed with bullet fragments lying in the area of the fracture." Baden said those bullets still could be removed and tested against possible murder weapons. Former inmate Larry Ellis, who had a cell next to Killen in 2007, told the FBI recently that Killen talked of having a murder weapon buried on his property and other evidence he kept against those involved in the killings. In an interview before his 2003 death, former state investigator George Metz said Killen shared that he had cleaned up the murder scene after the three young men were killed. Sykes suggested the FBI search Killen's property. To look at only one case at a time "is not going to work when our biggest enemy is time," he said. "We have to do like they did in the wild, wild West, where when someone was dangerous, they went out and looked for them. They didn't wait for somebody to bring them in." He's a little disappointed it's taken so long to get the funding, he said. "We've lost a lot of time, a lot of witnesses and a lot of perpetrators, but we'll do the best we can." |
|
|
Harold Meyerson: America's decade of dread |
|
America's decade of dread
By Harold Meyerson Wednesday, December 16, 2009; This decade began and ended in dread. It began with Wall Street -- the World Trade Center -- targeted for mass murder. It ends with Main Street fearful and reeling from economic reverses that Wall Street helped create. It was the decade of distraction. While the U.S. economy bubbled and then crumbled, the president for eight of the decade's 10 years embroiled us in a grudge match with Saddam Hussein and then persisted in throwing lives and money into the chaotic conflict that (as many predicted would happen) ensued. The decline of the American middle class was nowhere on his radar screen. The stocks bubble of the late 1990s was succeeded by a bubble in housing; these were the engines of our economic growth. America's production of goods no longer received the level of investment that had made it the engine of our economic growth from the mid-19th century through the 1970s. The change began at the outset of the Reagan years, when the percentage of corporate profits retained for new investment dropped sharply. A report from the International Labor Organization published last week shows where the money went: to shareholder dividends, disproportionately benefiting the wealthy. In the prosperity years of 1946 to 1979, dividends constituted 23 percent of profits. From 1980 to 2008, they constituted 46 percent. Finance boomed. The gap in annual wages between workers at financial companies and workers at non-financial companies, the ILO reports, grew from $11,000 in 1989 to $40,000 in 2007. The financial sector defended this shift by arguing that it had created many innovative financial products -- the very financial products that managed to turn downturn into Great Recession. In an interview in Monday's Wall Street Journal, former Fed chief Paul Volcker said that he has "found very little evidence that vast amounts of innovation in financial markets in recent years have had a visible effect on the productivity of the economy." He went on to say: "All I know is that the economy was rising very nicely in the 1950s and 1960s without all of these innovations." The dread in the land today isn't just a fear of losing your job -- or of your spouse, sister, father or child losing his or hers. It's a fear that America has been hollowed out, that we don't have a sustainable path back to mass prosperity, let alone to economic preeminence. A poll taken last month for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) shows that 44 percent of Americans considered China to be the world's leading economic power, while just 27 percent thought the United States still held that throne. Such fears can only be intensified by public policies that fail to champion America's national interests by fostering the flight of investment abroad. Overcoming some of our national phobia about having an industrial policy, the Obama administration has rightly targeted the renewable energy sector for investment -- a long overdue shift back to real, rather than financial, production. But we don't yet have policies to ensure that the real production we're fostering is done at home. As Joan Fitzgerald, director of the Law, Policy and Society program at Northeastern University, notes in a recent article, 84 percent of the $1.05 billion in federal clean-energy grants distributed since September has gone to foreign wind turbine manufacturers. Unionized, high-wage Germany and non-unionized, low-wage China both have thriving wind-power industries that profitably export their products to us. We have shunned policies that bolster domestic production, which is why more Americans are betting on China's economy than on our own. The problem is that America's economic elites have thrived on the financialization and globalization of the economy that have caused the incomes of the vast majority of their fellow Americans to stagnate or decline. The insecurity that haunts their compatriots is alien to them. Fully 85 percent of Americans in that CFR-sponsored poll said that protecting U.S. jobs should be a top foreign policy priority, but when the pollsters asked that question of the council's own members, just 21 percent said that protecting American jobs should be a top concern. The moral world that we see in that poll is the moral world of Charles Dickens. Of the elite of his day, he wrote in "Bleak House," "there is much good in it. . . ." But, he continued, "it is a world wrapped up in too much jeweller's cotton and fine wool, and cannot hear the rushing of the larger worlds, and cannot see them as they circle round the sun. It is a deadened world, and its growth is sometimes unhealthy for want of air." America, at the end of this dreadful decade.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
| << Start < Prev 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 Next > End >>
| | Results 6949 - 6973 of 15544 |
|
|
Latest News |
-
White House Intern,19-year-old virgin, had 18 month affair with JFK
-
French interior minister: some civilisations are “superior” to others
-
"Assad's army is close to collapse"
-
Obama's reelection campaign submarine
-
Global Warming Blankets Britain with Snow
-
LATimes: Sacrificing the desert to save the Earth
-
GOP freshmen focusing on self-survival
-
GOP: Agile, Mobile, Futile......
-
Don’t buy the GOP’s ‘Europe’
-
With NASDAQ at 11 year high, it won't be enough.
-
"They don’t want their great music involved in the impure business of politics.”
-
With 2012 decided, looking to 2016
-
Obama Reelected
-
Taliban leader Mullah Omar 'sent letter to Barack Obama'
-
An Aggressive Iran Has Decided to Fight
-
Obama Re-elected, NATO Pulls out, Taliban Returns - 15 wasted years
-
Leading a global effort to combat corruption?
-
"Mitt Romney is not heartless, he's merely clueless"
-
How does the Romney-Obama contest stack up?
-
LATimes: Romney a mixed blessing for Mormons
-
GOP Turbulence
-
The Trump trap
-
NYT: Secrecy Shrouds ‘Super PAC’ Funds
-
Newt: "I like hiring people."
-
Iran Still Not Afraid of Obama
-
AsiaTimes: US tells Israelis it won't join their fight
-
Ron Paul’s Long Game
-
Who Really Believes This?
-
Cal GOP Dying
-
Obama Doing Big Box Office in Hollywood
-
Have the Democrats Already Destroyed Romney?
-
LATimes: GOP's free-market pitch may flop in Nevada
-
"The New Mitt: Tougher, Shinier, with a Hint of Nixon"
-
AsiaTimes: No exit in the Persian Gulf
-
How Mitt Romney suckered Gingrich in Florida
-
Increasing Diversity May Make Western States Bluer
-
Country-club GOP establishment lays down the law
-
How to Rebut Obama's "I killed bin Laden."
-
LATimes: Romney's Florida win won't seal race
-
Super PACs Encouraged by Romney Investment
-
Terrorists Using Paltalk to Plan
-
"Newt Gingrich is too flawed a candidate to ultimately win this nomination"
-
But It Can Buy Him Florida....
-
Anti-Islamism Will Not Go Away
-
Fox News Marks 10 Years at No. 1 in Cable News
-
"Independents now have a less favorable opinion of Mr. Romney"
-
In Florida, Romney 39.5% Gingrich 26.53%
-
The down-side of US government-sponsored "democracy-promotion"
-
"Imperial errors cost US the Middle East"
-
Richard Cohen : The brain-dead GOP
-
Gingrich: Dead Man May Keep On Walking
-
Drudge: Taking Orders from Romney Central?
-
U.S. Gov builds case for attacking Iran
-
AsiaTimes: Iran well prepared for the worst
-
"The G.O.P.’s Own 1972"
-
HMS Dauntless Vs. Argentina's Air Force
-
Nobody Giving Gingrich a Chance
-
Frank Rich: Who in God’s Name Is Mitt Romney?
-
Joe Biden advised against bin Laden raid
-
Fearful GOP leaders pray Newt can be stopped in Florida
-
New anti-Obama themes: 'European socialism' and 'Saul Alinsky'
-
A Closer Look at the "Buffett Tax"
-
Lupica: Newt is a sad, old clown
-
Is Obama most polarizing president?
-
Miami's Cuban vote shifting, but still strongly Republican
-
Why Gingrich scares the party establishment
-
NYT: Will Israel Attack Iran?
-
Why and How Romney Went on Warpath
-
Staying In to Torture Mitt
-
Pentagon Seeks Mightier Bomb
-
McCain: "I think it could go on a while and it would not be to our benefit"
-
A warning from England about Obama's "socialist state"
-
Fox News psychiatrist: Newt's affairs are a good sign
-
Newt: Rebel without a pause
-
What Americans Mean When They Say They're Conservative
|
|