the daily democrat

The Daily Democrat
Home
News
Blog
Contact Us
Search
News Flash
  • 10:31 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Even America's liberal elites concede that Obama's Presidency is crumbling By Nile Gardiner World Last updated: September 8th, 2010  Democrats in Congress are no longer asking themselves whether this is going to be a bad election year for them and their party. They are asking whether it is going to be a disaster. The GOP pushed deep into Democratic-held territory over the summer, to the point where the party is well within range of picking up the 39 seats it would need to take control of the House. Overall, as many as 80 House seats could be at risk, and fewer than a dozen of these are held by Republicans.Political handicappers now say it is conceivable that the Republicans could also win the 10 seats they need to take back the Senate. Not since 1930 has the House changed hands without the Senate following suit.Is this a piece from National Review, The Weekly Standard, The Wall Street Journal or Fox News.com, all major conservative news outlets in the United States? No. It’s a direct quote from yesterday’s Washington Post, usually viewed by conservatives as a flagship of the liberal establishment inside the Beltway. The fact The Post is reporting that not only could Republicans sweep the House of Representatives this November, but may even take the Senate as well, is a reflection of just how far the mainstream, overwhelmingly left-of-centre US media has moved in the last month towards acknowledging the scale of the crisis facing the White House.To its credit, The Washington Post has generally been ahead of the curve compared to its main competitors such as The New York Times in reporting President Obama’s travails, but its striking front page coverage of the “Democrats’ plight” and talk of a possible GOP Senate win (regarded as…

    Read more...
  • 09:57 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Obama is a DemocatMilbank: He acts less like a dog than a feline -- hiding under the bed.Read Opinion    

    Read more...
  • 08:48 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Appeasing the Google Gods By Howard Kurtz I can no longer file a story in our computer system without filling out a box, a small gray square that may well determine the future of serious journalism.

    The box is supposed to contain words and phrases that will help me reel you in. Search has become a journalistic obsession on the Web, and with good reason. Most people don't read publications online, patiently turning from national news to Metro to Style to the sports section. They hunt for subjects, and people, in which they're interested.

    Our mission -- and we have no choice but to accept it -- is to grab some of that traffic that could otherwise end up at hundreds of other places, even blogs riffing off the reporting that your own publication has done. If you appease the Google gods with the right keywords, you are blessed with more readers. So carried to a hypothetical extreme, an ideal headline would be, "Sarah Palin rips non-Muslim Obama over mosque while Lady Gaga remains silent."

    Every newsroom in the country grapples with these questions, and The Washington Post is no exception."There's news we know people should read--because it's important and originates with our reporting--and that's our primary function," says Katharine Zaleski, The Post's executive producer and head of digital news products. "But we also have to be very aware of what people are searching for out there and want more information on...... If we're not doing that, we're not doing our jobs."

    In a recent interview, Politico Editor-in-Chief John Harris said he tries to serve the site's "core audience" rather than "chasing a huge number...I'm not expecting a reporter who covers an essential policy subject or covers lobbying in Washington to be among our huge traffic drivers."
    Read more...

  • 08:09 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Mayor Daley, shown with his wife, Maggie, and son, Patrick, kept his remarks brief when he announced Tuesday that he would not seek a seventh term in office. Daley, the nation's longest-serving big-city mayor, is retiring. Read Opinion     

    Read more...
  • 07:43 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     The End of Chicago's Daley DynastyRead Article    

    Read more...
  • 07:35 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

      Relatives with blood on their handsRobert Fisk: Women who found refuge in Hina Jilani's shelter died later at the hands of their families.Read Article     

    Read more...
  • 07:18 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     4 Reasons Lehman FailedLooking at what went wrong leading up to the bank's failure, which pushed the financial system into chaos and the U.S. further into recessionRead Article     

    Read more...
  • 07:11 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Obama's Proposals Unlikely to Pass SoonCongress is unlikely to quickly pass Obama's latest proposals to jump-start the economy, reflecting the president's weakened political position. Read Article   

    Read more...
  • 06:12 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Frank slams foe's 'Hitler' remarkRep. Barney Frank assailed his primary opponent in debate for comparing Obama to Hitler.Read Article      

    Read more...
  • 05:50 - 08.09.2010 News >> Latest

     Hillary Clinton condemns 9/11 Koran burning A Florida church's threat to burn copies of the Koran to mark the September 11 attacks called "disrespectful" and "disgraceful" by Secretary of State.  Read Article     

    Read more...
Obama successor: short, fat white man Print E-mail

 

Obama successor: short, fat white man

Wanted: short, fat white man to succeed Barack Obama
As the glamour of Barack Obama fades, Americans will turn to entirely different presidential candidates next time, says Toby Harnden.

 

You could call it the revenge of the ugly white guys. After electing a handsome sleek, biracial - and untested - man as President last time, Americans may well be ready for something entirely different in 2012.

Remember that you heard it here first: make way for the short, pudgy, balding white fellow who's been there and got the scars - and the results - to prove it.

In many respects, Barack Obama was the ultimate candidate for the television age. He looked fantastic and sounded wonderful. He soared above politics and made people feel better about themselves.

Ability to get things done? Track record? Such petty considerations seemed beside the point in 2008 for Obama was the very culmination of history. It was almost as if the then Senator for Illinois symbolised the end of politics, the point at which the perfect candidate drew a line under grubby partisanship.

Now, Americans have woken up from that dream and are living with the hangover. Neither history nor politics ended when Obama's ascended to the Oval Office. The recession is biting, unemployment is still hovering just below 10 per cent, the deficit is soaring and there is still gridlock in Washington.

Having elected two Senators as President and Vice-President for the first time since 1960, Americans are likely to look once again towards the more traditional stable for commanders-in-chief - the governor's mansions.

As the Republican challengers to Obama begin to prepare the ground for their 2012 runs, two hitherto unlikely potential candidates are gaining support among party insiders.

Before Obama, neither would have had a prayer. Mitch Daniels, described by the "Washington Post" as Indiana's "diminutive governor" sports what looks suspiciously like a combover.

He's the kind of geek who seemed straight from central casting as head of the Office of Management and Budget under President George W. Bush when I interviewed him in 2001.

In what Americans for some unfathomable reason refer to as "the Hoosier state", Daniels has been a quiet star, securing bipartisan support for a Healthy Indiana programme Indiana that provides health insurance for blue collar workers, cutting property taxes and turning an $800 billion deficit into a surplus.

Daniels remarked to Ross Douthat of the New York Times that "I've never seen a president of the United States when I look in the mirror" (which instantly sets himself apart from all 100 Senators). Douthat duly noted that Daniels would be the baldest President since Dwight Eisenhower, who left office in 1961.

Haley Barbour has more hair than Daniels but isn't much taller and if elected would be the most portly president since William Howard Taft, who occupied the White House from 1909 to 1913.

The Mississippi governor has a certain rumpled panache and Southern charm. I first bumped into him in a casino in his home state - where he later came to personify executive competence as he dealt masterfully with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina while neighbouring Louisiana lurched towards catastrophe.

Barbour - who has a political brain second to none - has always been dismissed as a possible presidential contender. That's partly because he has the perfect face for radio but also because he was a big-time lobbyist in Washington whose firm represented the tobacco industry.

But while Obama sanctimoniously instituted grand new rules to ban lobbyists from his administration and then immediately granted himself exceptions, at least with Barbour is up front about things. So could he really have a tilt at the White House? The door is ajar. "If you see me losing 40 pounds that means I'm either running or have cancer," he quipped a fortnight ago..

All this could be a problem for the likes of Mitt Romney - a.k.a.

"Matinee Mitt" - the buff, chiselled-jawed hunk who has not stopped running for President full-time since he lost out in 2008. And for Sarah Palin, who would be a celebrity candidate seeking to oust a celebrity president if she was pitted against Obama.

It might even make John McCain, who used to describe himself as "older than dirt, more scars than Frankenstein" when he was running against Obama, wonder whether he should resurrect that combover from the 1980s and have another go next time.

I'm not going to predict who'll succeed Obama. But I'll wager it will be someone whiter, shorter, uglier, fatter and balder who won't be able to deliver half as good a speech as the current commander-in-chief can.

 

 

 

 
< Prev   Next >
Latest News

© 2010 The Daily Democrat - created by JiaWebDesign web design and development